<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re Number G! *</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pqliving.com/were-number-g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pqliving.com/were-number-g/</link>
	<description>Downtown Washington DC/Penn Quarter news and urban commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourthandEye</title>
		<link>http://pqliving.com/were-number-g/comment-page-1/#comment-14478</link>
		<dc:creator>FourthandEye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pqliving.com/?p=5055#comment-14478</guid>
		<description>Kudos PQL!

I just flipped through the Washingtonian at CVS during lunch. I must admit that seeing blogs that post many times a day (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.princeofpetworth&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PoP&lt;/a&gt;) being honored in the same category as those that post 3 or 4 times a month (&lt;a href=&quot;http://whatsuparlington.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WUA&lt;/a&gt;) is a little odd...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos PQL!</p>
<p>I just flipped through the Washingtonian at CVS during lunch. I must admit that seeing blogs that post many times a day (<a href="http://www.princeofpetworth" rel="nofollow">PoP</a>) being honored in the same category as those that post 3 or 4 times a month (<a href="http://whatsuparlington.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">WUA</a>) is a little odd&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LiveAndWorkinPQ</title>
		<link>http://pqliving.com/were-number-g/comment-page-1/#comment-14475</link>
		<dc:creator>LiveAndWorkinPQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pqliving.com/?p=5055#comment-14475</guid>
		<description>the more they cut the substance of the paper, the closer it gets to the Metro Express which is already free for those of us downtown or riding metro (although of course not delivered)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the more they cut the substance of the paper, the closer it gets to the Metro Express which is already free for those of us downtown or riding metro (although of course not delivered)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Columbo</title>
		<link>http://pqliving.com/were-number-g/comment-page-1/#comment-14473</link>
		<dc:creator>Columbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pqliving.com/?p=5055#comment-14473</guid>
		<description>First off, thanks for the compliments, we really enjoy having such an active and vocal readership.

As for the demise of print publishing, I&#039;m with Anon.  I knew about the cost cutting measures the Post was introducing today, but it was still a shock to have the newspaper arrive today with no separate business section, and only two pages of comics (hey, I read them everyday) which were now significantly smaller in size than before.  We&#039;ve been Post subscribers for about 7 years, but we&#039;re canceling our subscription today.  Much as I like reading the newspaper in print, it&#039;s not worth it to me to spend the money for delivery everyday for something that is not only free online, but actually more substantial as well.

We&#039;ll probably still buy a paper most days, but we go out and jog first thing in the morning and can bring 50 cents with us when we want a paper.  I&#039;m sure the Post figured a certain percentage of subscribers would cancel when they made these cuts, just like Metro knows they&#039;ll lose some riders when they raise rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, thanks for the compliments, we really enjoy having such an active and vocal readership.</p>
<p>As for the demise of print publishing, I&#8217;m with Anon.  I knew about the cost cutting measures the Post was introducing today, but it was still a shock to have the newspaper arrive today with no separate business section, and only two pages of comics (hey, I read them everyday) which were now significantly smaller in size than before.  We&#8217;ve been Post subscribers for about 7 years, but we&#8217;re canceling our subscription today.  Much as I like reading the newspaper in print, it&#8217;s not worth it to me to spend the money for delivery everyday for something that is not only free online, but actually more substantial as well.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll probably still buy a paper most days, but we go out and jog first thing in the morning and can bring 50 cents with us when we want a paper.  I&#8217;m sure the Post figured a certain percentage of subscribers would cancel when they made these cuts, just like Metro knows they&#8217;ll lose some riders when they raise rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://pqliving.com/were-number-g/comment-page-1/#comment-14469</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pqliving.com/?p=5055#comment-14469</guid>
		<description>You are A +++</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are A +++</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://pqliving.com/were-number-g/comment-page-1/#comment-14467</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pqliving.com/?p=5055#comment-14467</guid>
		<description>In today&#039;s Post, there are explanations of their newest cost-cutting measures and the content that will now be available exclusively online.  I&#039;m beginning to feel like an extreme fool for paying them for a newspaper... now, not only could I get the same content for free online, I could get MORE content.  Why are they doing this?  Couldn&#039;t they at least charge a nominal fee, maybe $5 a month, for online access?  Or they could come up with an innovative fee structure, maybe charging per article accessed.  Maybe they have long-range plans for revenue generation, but in the meantime they&#039;re laying off the very people who provide the content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today&#8217;s Post, there are explanations of their newest cost-cutting measures and the content that will now be available exclusively online.  I&#8217;m beginning to feel like an extreme fool for paying them for a newspaper&#8230; now, not only could I get the same content for free online, I could get MORE content.  Why are they doing this?  Couldn&#8217;t they at least charge a nominal fee, maybe $5 a month, for online access?  Or they could come up with an innovative fee structure, maybe charging per article accessed.  Maybe they have long-range plans for revenue generation, but in the meantime they&#8217;re laying off the very people who provide the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pqresident</title>
		<link>http://pqliving.com/were-number-g/comment-page-1/#comment-14466</link>
		<dc:creator>pqresident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pqliving.com/?p=5055#comment-14466</guid>
		<description>growing up reading a print newspaper since high school, I have mixed emotions about this death of the print media concept. I think there will be a place for print for a while but its role is changing and much of that change hinges on how well newspapers and magazines both adapt and are active in shaping and advocating their media role in an evolving world. I think the serious newspapers need to rethink their giving away all of their content for free on the Internet.

the user interface and low cost (well, currently low cost) of reading a printed newspaper are really hard to beat. it&#039;s the distribution, real time update and giveaway of the content where the Internet spanks the print product and allows ventures like PQ Living to engage an audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>growing up reading a print newspaper since high school, I have mixed emotions about this death of the print media concept. I think there will be a place for print for a while but its role is changing and much of that change hinges on how well newspapers and magazines both adapt and are active in shaping and advocating their media role in an evolving world. I think the serious newspapers need to rethink their giving away all of their content for free on the Internet.</p>
<p>the user interface and low cost (well, currently low cost) of reading a printed newspaper are really hard to beat. it&#8217;s the distribution, real time update and giveaway of the content where the Internet spanks the print product and allows ventures like PQ Living to engage an audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IMGoph</title>
		<link>http://pqliving.com/were-number-g/comment-page-1/#comment-14461</link>
		<dc:creator>IMGoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pqliving.com/?p=5055#comment-14461</guid>
		<description>congratulations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>congratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

