Penn Quarter Living

Downtown Washington DC/Penn Quarter news and urban commentary

  • About
  • Local Links
  • Condos In PQ
  • Writers
  • Advertising
  • Commenting
  • Contact Us
  • RSS Feed
  • Comments

Downtown Survey Now Online

Posted by pqresident
November 21, 2008

It’s back! The Downtown Neighborhood Survey which we mentioned when it was first launched one year ago is now available in its second year online at the Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) website. Geared towards querying those who live and/or work in the downtown DC area, survey results will allow  downtown organizations to continue building a collective knowledge about our area’s demographic and economic characteristics. Why is this important? Businesses seeking to locate or relocate in our area can get a good sense of what our neighborhood both offers and needs.

The survey area is larger than that covered by the Downtown BID this year as it extends north and east to fully cover the Mount Vernon Triangle in addition to the southern portion of Shaw, areas which undoubtedly take advantage of the shopping, dining and entertainment downtown offers.

Please note that this is not a government census nor is filling it out required by law but you do become eligible for prizes and some of last year’s prizes were quite nice. And, you help out the neighborhood by doing so. This survey is jointly sponsored by the Downtown Neighborhood Association (DNA), The Downtowner newspaper and the Downtown BID.

Related posts:

  1. Downtown Neighborhood Survey Now Open
  2. Downtown Survey Period Closing This Friday
  3. Shaw Blog Explosion!
Share

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments
Comment by PQ Observer on November 21, 2008 @ 10:59 am

I took the survey, but it required me to enter my home address and there were no assurances of privacy. What’s up with that? Of course, the sponsors can now say someone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue filled out the survey… 😉

Comment by Jon on November 21, 2008 @ 12:14 pm

There are assurances of privacy on the last page when you click on the terms & conditions. Poorly designed — but important nonetheless.

Comment by FourthandEye on November 21, 2008 @ 2:49 pm

The address is important. It helps them carve out certain addresses for certain questions. For instance, 3 of the questions are asking if residents would be open to a small fee from the Downtown BID in exchange for greater services. The BID boundaries are a subset of the survey boundaries. The BID needs a way to exclude certain responses that aren’t in their service area. I for one answered ‘No’ to all the Downtown BID questions because I’m already in the MVT CIDs service area and don’t need to be double raked for fees. =)

Other than that I’d say address is probably meaningful to those that will analyze the data because spatial representation of data is increasingly becoming the rage.

Comment by anon on November 21, 2008 @ 4:29 pm

I had the same concerns as #1. They ask for specific info about our exact addresses and then make income a required question. As much as I support the association, I was not willing to disclose this information, despite the privacy assurances, so I closed out of the survey without completing it.

Comment by Freddie Mick on November 21, 2008 @ 5:54 pm

PQ Observer, are you in the House? If so, come to the Lincoln Bedroom for a séance at midnight tonight.

Comment by Anonymous on November 21, 2008 @ 6:15 pm

Based on those same privacy concerns, I also stopped midway through the survey and didn’t complete it. I don’t understand why they need an exact address. A separate question asks if you reside in the BID area, and if you’re going to lie on that one, you’re going to make up an address anyway.

Comment by FourthandEye on November 21, 2008 @ 8:33 pm

#1/#4 – Odds are if you live downtown you live in a multi-unit building. What about just leaving your unit number off the address? Would that ease your mind some? The building only address probably still gives the survey tabulators enough to work with.

Comment by Anonymous on November 24, 2008 @ 11:37 am

Please complete the survey. Just don’t put your unit number on there. How about a House of Blues in the neighborhood?

Comment by DCDNA on November 25, 2008 @ 11:29 am

There are several questions concerning privacy. The reason we need to know the address is so we can identify the building and make appropriate geographic weighting. The second reason is that prizes are being given and we need to know who to contact and, hopefully, be able to announce who the winners are. There were many great prizes given out last year and the the survey collaborators want to be able to announce who won.

Individual contact information is not being shared, marketed to, or revealed in any way beyond prize announcement.

Thanks,

Miles E. Groves
Downtown Neighborhood Association

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Search

Archives

  • June 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • Recent Comments

      • Take A 10-question Survey To Tell The Downtown DC BID About Your Vision For Gallery Place-Chinatown
        Terrie Chan said: Chinatown...(more)
      • Penn Quarter CVS In Lansburgh Building Closing This Month (435 8th St NW)
        Natalie said: Oh, CVS, you will be missed by us. Last...(more)
      • Penn Quarter Paul Now Fully Closed (801 Penn Ave NW)
        Jo-Ann neuhaus said: Thank you for being out and reporting on opened and...(more)
      • Residents Meet With DC Council At Roundtable Regarding On-Street Musician Noise
        Joan Eisenstodt said: Woohoo. Sorry I was away...(more)
      • Uniqlo Opening On F St In Two Days (1090 F St NW)
        GalleryPlaceGal said: They are open for 6 months; looking for a larger store...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Restaurant Now Open (750 E St NW)
        TC said: After seeing this posting (thx!) we tried HQ the next day. Have to say...(more)
      • Weschler’s Auctioneers & Appraisers Moving To The Suburbs
        Xena said: This is my old office…we just moved a few...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        pqresident said: Thanks @Christina and @Jen for the updates!(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        Jen said: Yep. They are training the staff all next week...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        Christina said: I was told by the crew that was trying to...(more)


Copyright 2006-2023. Penn Quarter Living. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Local Links
  • Condos In PQ
  • Writers
  • Advertising
  • Commenting
  • Contact Us