Penn Quarter Living

Downtown Washington DC/Penn Quarter news and urban commentary

  • About
  • Local Links
  • Condos In PQ
  • Writers
  • Advertising
  • Commenting
  • Contact Us
  • RSS Feed
  • Comments

Convention Center Hotel Update

Posted by pqresident
September 12, 2007

WaPo reports that the costs for the long awaited convention center hotel at Massachusetts Ave and 9th Street are escalating and the timeline is stretching farther into the future possibly altering or sinking the prospect of construction. The hotel was to be the largest in DC with 1,400 rooms.

Ed. Note: We added the following related links, some of which were pointed out by commenters (thanks!):

WaPo – A Bad Idea’s Slow But Merciful Death (Perlstein)
WaPo – Perlstein Live (online chat with some Q & A on the hotel update)
WaTimes Examiner – Shaw Businesses Hit By Center Hit Back
WaTimes Examiner – Unconventional Trouble
WRC Channel 4 – Convention Center Hotel May Not Happen
WAMU 88.5 FM Radio Interview with Mayor Fenty – DC Politics Hour Live with Kojo & Jonetta (skip ahead to 20:50)

Related posts:

  1. Old Convention Center Site Update From Hines (March ’08 Start & Public Meeting)
  2. Old Convention Center Site Design Workshop Tonight
  3. New Retail For The New Convention Center
Share

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments
Comment by dave on September 12, 2007 @ 10:12 am

i have no doubt that getting a hotel would be good for DC. but I wonder whether having more tourists in the neighborhood would be good for PQ residents. won’t there just be more touristy restaurants at the expense of residential amenities?

Comment by Shawident on September 12, 2007 @ 10:20 am

Washington Times had a big story on how the convention center has hurt local retailers:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20070909/NATION/109090031/1002
and
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20070909/NATION/109090032/1002

Comment by monkeyrotica on September 12, 2007 @ 10:27 am

Still don’t see why they can’t augment the former convention site with hotel space. Is there some law preventing condos, retail, AND hotel space on the site? I mean, condo sales are still strong, but hotel occupancy is pretty weak. Does a mega hotel make any sense given the current economy? Mixing hotel space with retail, residential, AND office would guarantee foot traffic at all hours, which is what city life is supposed to be about.

Comment by Tom Veil on September 12, 2007 @ 10:45 am

If the government needs to be this deeply involved in order to get a hotel built, well, maybe that means there’s no market for the hotel. This is not exactly an area like low-income housing where we need the government to save us from ourselves.

Comment by CBD on September 12, 2007 @ 11:03 am

Yikes, I really hope this happens. That area needs as much growth and investment as possible to continue to become safer and nicer and fulfill its potential. That site would be great for a mixed-use complex like the Willard complex (hotel, restaurants, retail, office space…).

Comment by Andy in PQ on September 12, 2007 @ 12:05 pm

Well there’s definitely a need for it. I work for a farily large organization that has a annual conference with thousands of attendees. The meeting comes to DC every 3 or 4 years, and I’ve been told we won’t use the new convention center because there aren’t enough hotels in the area immediate area to house staff and important guests. They end up holding it in Dupont Circle or Woodly Park instead.

Its insane to have such a large convention center with so few hotels servicing it. If the city is losing convention center revenue becasue of it, I think they should try to remedy the situation.

As for tourists in the neighborhood, they annoy me as well. But I understand that we will have to co-exist since there aren’t enough residents in the area to make us a viable economic force.

Comment by JNo on September 12, 2007 @ 12:23 pm

Steve Pearlstien has an interesting argument against a ginormous Hotel on that site. It’s in the post Business section. A good read.

Comment by Tim on September 12, 2007 @ 12:56 pm

Too bad the National Harbor in Prince George’s County will kill any effort to make the Convention Center in DC the area’s top convention host.

I thought the private sector would have filled the void and built a large hotel around DC convention center, but I guess it wasn’t meant to be. Didn’t conventional wisdom (pun intended) relegate convention centers too urban planning hell in the 1990s? They’re only a successful business in places like San Diego, Miami and Las Vegas.

Comment by pqresident on September 12, 2007 @ 12:56 pm

the article JNo 12:23 references can be found here (A Bad Idea’s Slow but Merciful Death).

thanks JNo!

Comment by Ben on September 12, 2007 @ 4:41 pm

If I recall correctly, Roadside Development released plans to construct a hotel on the premises of the forthcoming O St. Market project (the one with the new Giant). I’m sure that whatever ends up going in there won’t be as large as what was envisioned for the Convention Center, but it’s something.

I’ll also say that the Washington Convention Center is one of the few I’ve seen that doesn’t have a prominent hotel near it. How much that hurts the Conv. Center, I don’t really know.

Comment by David on September 12, 2007 @ 4:53 pm

Construction costs are rising but that affects all property types… the hotel market is dead in DC… we won’t touch anything hotel related with a 10 foot pole.

Comment by keith on September 12, 2007 @ 7:09 pm

Please email the mayor to build it on land they already own (old conv. ctr).

Comment by JNo on September 13, 2007 @ 8:53 am

I like the idea of a few smaller hotels. Personally, I don’t like really large convention hotels.

Anyone here about the W Hotel going into the Hotel Washington? I read an announcement was imminent.

Comment by Ben on September 13, 2007 @ 9:35 am

“Please email the mayor to build it on land they already own (old conv. ctr).”

Then what was the purpose of constructing a new convention center in Shaw? The idea, of course, was to spur business development and growth in the neighborhood. Instead, the effect has been–not much. A few restaurants, a few galleries, and still a lot of blight. Having a large hotel–or a few smaller hotels–immediately within the vicinity of the convention center could go a long ways towards keeping a sizeable portion of the pedestrian foot traffic in and around the area. Instead, at the conclusion of every day, the conventioneers disperse throughout the city, most of them to neighbohoods not called Shaw.

I understand the argument behind the rising costs of construction, but this is a project that never should have taken this long to get going.

Comment by Si Kailian on September 13, 2007 @ 11:35 am

wash times not examiner :)

Comment by pqresident on September 13, 2007 @ 6:45 pm

thanks Si. 😉

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Search

Archives

  • June 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • Recent Comments

      • Take A 10-question Survey To Tell The Downtown DC BID About Your Vision For Gallery Place-Chinatown
        Terrie Chan said: Chinatown...(more)
      • Penn Quarter CVS In Lansburgh Building Closing This Month (435 8th St NW)
        Natalie said: Oh, CVS, you will be missed by us. Last...(more)
      • Penn Quarter Paul Now Fully Closed (801 Penn Ave NW)
        Jo-Ann neuhaus said: Thank you for being out and reporting on opened and...(more)
      • Residents Meet With DC Council At Roundtable Regarding On-Street Musician Noise
        Joan Eisenstodt said: Woohoo. Sorry I was away...(more)
      • Uniqlo Opening On F St In Two Days (1090 F St NW)
        GalleryPlaceGal said: They are open for 6 months; looking for a larger store...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Restaurant Now Open (750 E St NW)
        TC said: After seeing this posting (thx!) we tried HQ the next day. Have to say...(more)
      • Weschler’s Auctioneers & Appraisers Moving To The Suburbs
        Xena said: This is my old office…we just moved a few...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        pqresident said: Thanks @Christina and @Jen for the updates!(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        Jen said: Yep. They are training the staff all next week...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        Christina said: I was told by the crew that was trying to...(more)


Copyright 2006-2023. Penn Quarter Living. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Local Links
  • Condos In PQ
  • Writers
  • Advertising
  • Commenting
  • Contact Us