Penn Quarter Living

Downtown Washington DC/Penn Quarter news and urban commentary

  • About
  • Local Links
  • Condos In PQ
  • Writers
  • Advertising
  • Commenting
  • Contact Us
  • RSS Feed
  • Comments

Mayor Fenty Suspends Leasing Enforcement For Inauguration

Posted by gpliving
November 22, 2008

As has been mentioned in the WaPo and other publications, on Nov 18, Mayor Fenty implemented Mayor’s Order 2008-156:

The District of Columbia’s Office of the Attorney General and Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs will not enforce the District of Columbia’s licensing and certificate of occupancy requirements with respect to leases, rentals, and similar arrangements, whether or not in writing, between the owner or renter of a dwelling unit and one or more unrelated persons that permits such persons to occupy all or part of the unit beginning on or after January 13. 2009, and ending on or before January 27, 2009.

Also, according to the WaPo article:

The city’s Office of Tax and Revenue announced it will suspend a 14.5 percent sales tax on property rentals to transients for residents who want to rent their apartments or homes to out-of-towners for the inauguration.

This does seem to alleviate any concerns with complying with DC occupancy and tax requirements during the inauguration, but since most of us are condo/apartment dwellers, we’re still subject to our condo association restrictions.  There’s a lot of time between now and January 20, 2009.  Will we see condo associations start to consider accommodating short term leases?

Related posts:

  1. Mayor Fenty Announces New Homeless Strategy
  2. Tomorrow’s DNA Meeting – Mayor Fenty, CM Evans & CM Wells
  3. Mayor Fenty Comes to Chinatown Tonight! (Chinatown Revitalization Council)
Share

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments
Comment by Steve701Penn on November 22, 2008 @ 9:18 am

shwing!

Comment by Bri on November 22, 2008 @ 9:39 am

Yea, that pretty much solidifies that I’m going to try to rent out my apartment. The money is just too much and justifies the inconvenience. Sorry neighbors! But, my stuff is important to me so I will be screening and will get a large deposit to ensure nothing goes too wrong. I mean, what’s the downside besides irritating some neighbors IF they even found out? A $50 fine? Eviction (in this economy)?? Me thinks none of the above…

Comment by Mike on November 22, 2008 @ 11:16 am

My condo associatio has an unlimited fine amount for short term rentals in the official policy and is considering setting a fine close to the amount I could get for my apartment. Can they do that?

Comment by triangleanon on November 22, 2008 @ 12:11 pm

Yes — I believe that your condo can raise the fine. My condo said it would shut off fob access for the renters if they showed up. It is likely that they would be treating the concierge like hotel staff so it is likely that most renters will actually be noticed. The fact that Bri doesn’t think its a big deal to irritate her neighbors underscores how important it is to protect our condo assets.

Comment by Bri on November 22, 2008 @ 1:28 pm

Really?? How can they have a bylaw that states unlimited fines? That sounds illegal to me. Does the bylaw say “fine to be determined by Board hearing” or something? Condo boards are stifling!! Why not just let people live their lives and MYOB :)

Granted, I see a reason for bylaws as you don’t want complete anarchy in your building and you want to protect property values. But really it seems like most Boards just nit pick owners. People live in single family neighborhoods and most of time everyone is respectful to each other. Now I know I’m going to get flamed for this as people will say “well if you want a single family neighborhood then go live there”. So have at it…

Comment by Anon on November 23, 2008 @ 5:08 am

Bri — don’t think you should get flamed for wanting a single-family neighbor hood – however, your basic lack of respect and courtesy for your neighbors that share the common spaces in your building may be why you see condo boards as “stifling”. The reason that you can’t just “live your life” is that your actions impact others. Condo board rules exist to ensure that your life doesn’t encroach too much on your neighbors. Grow up. A condo isn’t a college dorm.

Comment by Omari on November 23, 2008 @ 11:13 am

These comments show why I would never buy a condo. They are ruled by petty overlords who are accountable to no one. If I want to deal with an idiotic property master, I would rather call him “landlord” and stick him with the responsibility of paying property taxes and the risk of losing the principal in this lousy real estate market.

Comment by Bri on November 23, 2008 @ 1:01 pm

Omari – that’s the very reason I sold my condo and went back to renting. I do enjoy living in the city and unfortunately am not ready to go back to living in a single family neighborhood. Right now I enjoy being able to walk everywhere.

Anon – I don’t show any lack of respect at all to my neighbors. I try to keep quiet and don’t think I impose on any of my neighbors at all. I would seek this same type of individual to rent my place. AND I realize that actions have an impact on others… actions in single family neighborhoods have impact on others as well. People all over have parties, decorate strangely, etc and still coexist. I just wish condos weren’t so controlling.

Condos will survive a week long tenant. There’s no way they could undermine the value of the entire property so quickly. I think people can chill out and see the opportunity here to get helped out financially and likewise help out somebody wanting a nice place to stay during a historic occasion. The reasoning that a person would have parties, let people into the building, use the concierge, whatever is bogus. People who own can do the same thing. You think I check ID’s of the people who walk in behind me into the building? I don’t even recognize half the people. That’s why we have locks on the door. Gasp… just like in a regular neighborhood! And if you do feel that way you should ban all tenants because I rent from an owner and sorry to say I don’t have a stake financially in the outcome of the building I live in. That’s not to say that I purposely do anything to mess it up, I’m respectful and want a nice place to live.

Most people aren’t going to notice the weekly renters so it’s not a big deal. Sorry to hear that people are going to be upset over nothing! Really, somebody able to afford a few thousand dollars to rent a place is generally the type of person that would live here already, know what I mean? Same goes for people like me who rent from an owner – I can pay $500k for my own condo, I just don’t want to. I’d rather rent right now personally. But I’m no different in “class” than my neighbors.

Comment by Bri on November 23, 2008 @ 1:06 pm

What condo boards should be doing is letting people rent out their units and that way they’ll know who’s who. They could approve the tenants and then everyone would be happy. Maybe even make the people renting pay a little fee to hire a security guard or something that could break up parties or make sure the building is safe. And they could even come up with a standard contract for everyone to ensure rules are followed and the building asset is protected. If Fenty is loosening restrictions, Boards should take that as their queue to do the same…. at least just this one time.

Comment by Anon on November 23, 2008 @ 1:25 pm

Our Board has decided to overlook the inaugural rentals — our only recourse was to fine owners $50 — nothing when compared to a weekly rental income of more than a few thousand dollars. Then again, our building is VERY laid back.

Comment by jason on November 23, 2008 @ 4:44 pm

wow… condo boards are messed up if they don’t “let” people rent out their place for a few days…you think someone who is going to pay hundreds of dollars to be here for inauguration is going to mess up the place?? screw it im not asking your permission im doing it anyway

Comment by Linda on November 23, 2008 @ 4:52 pm

Long before the election, I made plans to be out of town inaugural weekend (now, I’m sorry I’ll miss the events). I’d like to be able to rent out my place without fear of being fined by the condo.

It would be nice if our associations would formally agree to participate in these short-term rentals. Why couldn’t we make an exception for an event like this-as long as we notify the board who is renting our place? This is likely a once-in-a-lifetime event. It’s not like this sort of thing is going to happen on a regular basis.

I don’t think most of us that would consider allowing hoards of partiers into our home. If a potential leasee doesn’t care about their neighbors, they are sure to care about their own home. I’d be happy to work within certain parameters established by the condo assoc…like giving them the names and any other info they need about the renters and agreeing to provide renters with certain information about the use of our community property–like, don’t expect to use our front-desk personnel as their concierge.

A lot of people are going to do this, regardless of the condo rules. It would be nice if our boards would agree to participate in the process and control it in some way.

Comment by Linda on November 23, 2008 @ 4:54 pm

Oops, sorry, typo…I meant “If a potential LESSOR doesn’t care about their neighbors, they are sure to care about their own home.”

Comment by Anonymous on November 23, 2008 @ 8:57 pm

I can assure everyone who attempts to rent out their unit in my building in contravention of the rules (you know, the rules that you agreed to by purchasing in our building or renting from an owner) that as soon as I see one of the inaugural renters in my building, I will have them arrested for trespassing and whatever other laws they may be breaking.

Comment by Freddie Mick on November 23, 2008 @ 10:09 pm

If a weekend renter rapes or kills someone in your building, well, good luck – you’ll be sued. & the condo building will be sued, & if the board was negligent, the condo will have to pay. Insurance policies also might be voided by the presence of temporary renters, so if the building burns down, good luck. Etc.
If you want to live in a transient hotel, well, there are some of those in DC. If you want to live in a respectable building, there will be rules. If you don’t want to follow the rules, then find a place that has no rules.
Many subdivisions have usage rules. Most property in the US is under one kind of a restriction or another. The days where Dan’l Boone could move once he saw a neighbor’s smoke are long gone. Either adapt or go extinct.
My condo building will have vigilant neighbors watching for temporary renters. Anyone trying a temporary rental will be fined the amount of the rental plus $5,000.
Go ahead & try to rent your place – make my day.
We are watching. & we will catch you.

Comment by Anon2 on November 23, 2008 @ 11:11 pm

I agree with the people that say that condos (both their boards and their vocal residents) are filled with petty petty petty people. I am renting out my PQ condo. From reading these web log posts, I think I’m in one of the buildings where some of the aforementioned petty people live in. Well, all I can see is that I am obviously screening who is coming in, and I really don’t think you’ll ever notice that they are there. And if you do notice, and they cause NO damage, then I do not think you should be upset. If they cause damage, by all means come to me and ask me to fix the situation. But don’t spend OUR condo fees trying to create a nanny state. I’ve read crazy web log posts about condo boards hiring people to troll craigslist—and I think it is absolutely disgusting if they are using OUR CONDO FEES to finance this type of irresponsible service. WE ARE ADULTS. TREAT US LIKE ADULTS. YOU LIVE IN A CITY NEXT TO PEOPLE THAT AREN’T YOUR EXACT CLONE. IF THE NON-EXACT-CLONE NEIGHBOR ACTUALLY DOES SOMETHING THAT HARMS THE COMMON ELEMENTS, ***THEN*** YOU MAY COME AFTER THEM. Otherwise, it really is like pulling someone over because “THEY” are in “YOUR” neighborhood DWB.

Comment by Loofa133 on November 24, 2008 @ 7:01 am

Temporary renters wouldn’t be trespassing, even if your condo doesn’t allow them, especially if they have a lease or something.

Comment by ANON on November 24, 2008 @ 7:25 am

Those of you thinking about renting — what kind of insurance do you have to cover damage to common areas of the building from your carefully screened renters? Do you have a contract with them that spells out their liability in case of a problem? Have you spelled out exactly how many people can stay in condo? How are you going to verify this? Sure you might check the credit rating of the person who calls you, and you may chat a bit — but that is really all you can do. Even if it is a best case scenario and the folks you rent to ONLY bring the number of people you allow, stuff happens and things get broken. You all say you are going to be carefull and bring in good tenents — but what about the person who just wants to make the quick buck and only cares that the check clears. God forbid that the worse case scenario spelled out by Freddie Mick happens Having rules against short term tenants is a reasonable and responsible precaution tp protect the interests of the owners against a few short sighted people. The extreme reaction of some of the posters here just makes the need for these rules that much more obvious

Comment by triangleanon on November 24, 2008 @ 10:00 am

I just saw a guy trying to break into our condo. What happens to the residents when these “temporary renters” start letting anyone into the building because they don’t know the condo rules or that it is secured access? Also (for Bri) — does your owner know that you are subletting? I’m sure the owner of the unit might have something to say about putting strangers inside her property. As much as you say your are “adults,” true adults would respect their contractual agreements and not put their building and their neighbors in a position where they have to enforce this type of situation. And, by the way, I know some guys who are repeated problems for their condo who are trying to rent out their unit — I feel for their neighbors.

Comment by Anonymous on November 24, 2008 @ 10:41 am

Temporary renters WOULD be trespassing, as their leases would not be valid (depending on the specific rules of the building) and they would not have proper authorization to be in the building.

Asking people to follow the rules by which they are contractually bound is not being petty. Sending inspectors to measure doormat dimensions is petty. Restricting the type of blinds someone may put on their windows is relatively petty. Ensuring the safety of the building’s residents and their collective property and investment by enforcing rules related to running a hotel out of one’s unit is NOT petty.

Comment by Bri on November 24, 2008 @ 10:52 am

OK, OK Freddie… could you possibly think of a more worst case scenario??

I’m glad to see there are more reasonable people on here than not. Anonymouse, seriously?? Do you not have anything better to do than police your neighbors?

Comment by Anonymous on November 24, 2008 @ 3:57 pm

So if someone rents out their unit and the renters do no harm to anyone or anything in the building, you still advocate using the Board’s and owners’ resources to try and fine the owners? Get a life. If someone breaks something or disrupts your life in some way, fine, do something about it. But if nothing happens, mind your own business. I have lived in my building for 3 years and see almost none of my neighbors. I hope that the first time I meet them is not when they come out of their hibernation to watch everyone who comes in and out of the building. Enjoy the inauguration and try to make an exception for this one event. People are losing their jobs all over the place and in an economy like this, I wouldn’t fault anyone for trying to make a little money by renting to someone responsibly.

Comment by m&m on November 24, 2008 @ 3:58 pm

BTW,

In my building there are tons of college subletors each summer who are here for 1-3 months.
Are people going to have them arrested 4 trespassing????

SOME PEOPLE NEED TO GET A LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by Loofa133 on November 24, 2008 @ 5:41 pm

Regarding trespassing, they wouldn’t be. I can get all legal technical, but they aren’t. For simplicity sake, i’ve invited them to the condo and therefore it is not trespassing, valid lease or not.

“Those of you thinking about renting — what kind of insurance do you have to cover damage to common areas of the building from your carefully screened renters?”

None. I don’t see how this is different than now. I don’t have insurance covering this now. I assume the condo association would be covered if I went nuts and damaged the common areas. Certainly they could sue the renters for damages, though I guess.

“Do you have a contract with them that spells out their liability in case of a problem?”

Yes, my contract says they are liable and indemnify me for anything I need to pay. Very simple.

“Have you spelled out exactly how many people can stay in condo? How are you going to verify this?”

Yes I have spelled it out and have their names and information. If there are more people? I don’t know that I care. I don’t see how this is different than when I invite 30 people over for a party or my buddies get drunk and sleep over.

I find all this commotion rather funny. If I was letting a friend use my condo for inauguration or if I was letting my 12 relatives and their 13 kids to stay in my condo, no one would care or blink an eye. But damned be me if I have someone pay to stay in my place.

Comment by Freddie Mick on November 24, 2008 @ 6:21 pm

A big part of life is planning ahead to avoid disasters. Hence, insurance.
Allowing temporary renters into a building is fraught with dangers, & it’s only a matter of time & chance until something disastrous occurs. Trying to protect one’s safety and one’s investment is not foolish – one cannot “get a life” if one’s life has been forfeited to a killer let in by some foolish, selfish, money-grubbing person.
Yes, having four college kids living next door in a one-bedroom apartment is a great idea – that’ll increase your condo’s value. & sure, just turn all the buildings into short term rentals – lots of people want to pay $600 K to live in a building with temps.
Follow the rules. If you don’t like the rules, petition to change the rules, or find a place that has rules you can obey. It’s called democracy, & any time one lives around other people, one has to be ready to adjust one’s whims if those whims clash with the rules established by the whole.

Comment by Anonymous on November 24, 2008 @ 7:59 pm

Since when does someone who wants to kill someone need to pay $5000 to do so? As for renters letting people in, I don’t think there is a difference b/w that and the 90% of the residents in my building who do it EVERY day. Are you serious? No one is arguing to relax the rules every week; this is so people can share in a historic inauguration day. Relax, you will be fine, after the week is over you will be in the same position and hopefully some others in your building will be $5k richer.

Comment by Peter Lopes on November 24, 2008 @ 8:25 pm

Everything that the anti-short term lease crowd has said is valid, so valid the city has strict laws against such arrangements written or verbal. The fact that the Districts attorney general, City Hall and DC council (who agree on very little) have all agreed to relax/ suspend the districts sublease / occupancy laws in light of the bigness of the event is telling. We need to get over ourselves, adjust bylaws to allow for reasonable and safe arrangements to be made that protect all interest. First, never argue with a fool because on lookers can’t tell the difference between you. The I could get raped or attacked crowd is simply ridiculous. Living in this great city or small town (Sara Palin’s) America all has its inherent risk, that’s why we are savvy and street smart. Let me get this straight three million people coming to witness history and some of us happen to live with the three idiots who’d rather patrol the halls of their condo. Purchase a co-op in the future folks and allow your big brother antics to run wild. Sometimes things will happen in our lives that necessitate a tweaking of the rules. Yes, this would apply….pull your heads out of your grass and get in front of this issue. Condo boards do what your elected to do (use your brains), put short term rules in place for additional security measures, require would be condo owners/ landlords to off set the cost of any additional measures and provide a list of all owners emergency contact info, condo owners should allow condo associations to hold all security deposits until buildings are assessed post inaugural. Set a reasonable time frame for this policy and shift the cost of such measures to those who are subleasing. Once this is done the citizens’ arrest clowns can fold up their chairs relax and enjoy the festivities or simply get out of town and have the peace of mind in knowing that their assets are being protected by professionals.

Heads up folks my 6’4 240lb Massachusetts State trooper brother and one of his colleagues will be residing in my unit free of charge, They will be here on a security detail, they wont recognize you and you wont recognize them, please don’t get any ideas….

Comment by Geezer1 on November 24, 2008 @ 11:13 pm

Ah the halcyon days of youth … a time before you realize that life has a million ways to bite you in the butt and you learn that rules like banning short term rentals in condo buildings are a good way to keep the pain to a minimum

Comment by guest on November 25, 2008 @ 1:17 am

I think the liability concerns are valid and people who diagree are being naive. That said, it appears that some people are going to rent their units for the Inauguration regardless of whether the condo rules strictly forbid short-term rentals. Consequently, it seems the prudent approach would be for condo associations to grant an exception for this event and actually regulate it, for example, by requiring a security deposit, the names, addresses, and copies of drivers’ licenses of all short-term tenants, and perhaps proof of no criminal records (as is required by many rental buildings).

In addition, while people have mentioned insurance covering the renters (for the unit owners), I don’t believe anyone has mentioned the possibility that the terms of the condos’ master policies may very well not permit short term rentals, as these may be perceived as posing increased risk of loss. If that is the case, the condo association may not be able to grant an exception, or, at the very least, the building an/or the unit owners would have to obtain additional insurance covering the situation.

Comment by triangleanon on November 25, 2008 @ 6:57 am

Not one person has approached our condo board with a request to sublet. In fact, the only units found to be subletting are owners. Our condo board only has a relationship with the unit owners and those owners were unaware of their renter’s desire to short-term rent. By ignoring the bylaws we would not be acting in the fiduciary interest of our co-owners. And you are correct — the insurance would have to be increased for these occurances. Our board is not wavering and is not allowing these types of rentals. Folks are more than welcome to let their friends stay for free. And folks like Bri who say they don’t care about their neighbors seem to only underscore why we need bylaws.

Comment by Anonymous on November 25, 2008 @ 11:35 am

While I’m still opposed to people ignoring rules regarding the short-term leases, I think guest @ 1:17am outlined a reasonable compromise. Perhaps as an addition to that, I would suggest that the security fobs of those units being leased be turned off for the duration of the rental, requiring renters to stop at the security desk (in our building anyway) and sign in each time they enter the building. It may be a bit inconvenient for the renter, but I think it’s a reasonable, if not 100% foolproof, security protection.

Comment by Jaylin on November 25, 2008 @ 5:05 pm

Haha – The continual hall monitors have their panties in a bunch! This string of comments is quite amusing, especially if the Freddy Mick commenter is real. When he says, “Allowing temporary renters into a building is fraught with dangers, & it’s only a matter of time & chance until something disastrous occurs”, I wonder what a day in his/her shoes are like. I wonder if this guy has a frightening and dramatic life or is just a neurotic control freak. (This guy is probably my neighbor now that I’ve typed this.)

I am renting out my condo for the inauguration. My condo association doesn’t allow for this. As soon as the election was over, the HOA posted signs in the elevator reiterating the rules.

In fact, my neighbors hate me and will probably be best friends forever with the renters who are coming in January.

Comment by Steve701Penn on November 25, 2008 @ 5:38 pm

LOL, my condo sent out an email last night saying that renting is punishable according to the bylaws, and what do you know? More people listed their condos today!

That original email probably shouldn’t have said that people were asking exorbitant sums.

Comment by PQGirl on November 25, 2008 @ 8:39 pm

I’ll be in Mexico during the inaugural, so I got permission from my landlady to let my parents and brother stay in the condo. She was cool with it, I was cool with it.

She went to the condo board meeting a few weeks back and mentioned that we had made this deal and some self-important jerk threatens to throw her out of her condo if she tries it. They’re not paying money to stay in my place, they’re respectable people, and they’ll be here for 5 days. But according to some power hungry condo board member, they’re a disruption and “rule breakers”.

Nobody likes a hall monitor.

Comment by triangleanon on November 26, 2008 @ 9:35 am

Come on folks — we all know that condo boards are not regulating the guests — only the short-term rentals as laid out in their policies. PQ Girl — you are just trying to bait folks. And Steve at 701 Penn — read the City Paper and you will find out that folks are simply not getting the huge sums that they are asking. I doubt your condo is rampant with greedy folks trying to cash in. Given the rude remarks flying on this thread, it seems there are many folks that are simply not cut out for multi-family living. I hope all of you consider your next housing option carefully since you clearly dislike and disrespect your neighbors so much.

Comment by PQGirl on November 26, 2008 @ 12:52 pm

I don’t dislike or disrespect my neighbors. I simply think it is unfair that one member of a condo board now has my landlady so afraid of being fined for what he considers a violation of the visitors and guests policy that my family will now need to pay an exorbitant sum for a hotel instead of just staying in my empty condo.

And I’m not sure who you are accusing me of baiting since you are the only one who commented after me.

Comment by Steve701Penn on November 26, 2008 @ 2:52 pm

PQGirl, all in all, you’re probably fine letting your family stay for free. Just search through your bylaws and rental agreement. There are usually only limitations on subleases, and you will not be doing any sort of a sublease.

If you can’t find any violations regarding your intended action, that self-important man will have no ability to remove your landlord from the building. Even so, that sort of matter would probably require a vote in which 1 heartless vote is not enough to have any sort of effect.

But then you could get into the whole fun politics of HOA’s where (generally old and/or stay-at-home) people with no lives lobby for things to make themselves feel like their lives have meaning.

Comment by Funny thing on November 26, 2008 @ 4:44 pm

BOD say they are protecting our interests and often they are. But maybe less focus should be put on this one weekend and more on really managing the buildings to balance condo fee increases with needed maintenance to keep prop values from declining. I see much to focus on, for example PQ bldgs have no plantings in tree wells, let trees die, dont sufficiently oversee cleaning staff (spots on carpet for weeks–and I often see cleaning person vacuuming but missing over half the carpet. Result higher condo fees 4-6 years from now b/c of unnecessary carpet wear). I could go on. They do good things but sometimes are not watching bldg mgrs so workout machines go unrepaired and AC is cranked on high even on colder days.

Comment by gpliving on November 26, 2008 @ 9:27 pm

A quick note from the comment moderation department: Comments may be rejected if they contain .. condo/apartment building specific information especially if it is with denigrating intent. For more info, please see our comment policy.

Comment by Freddie Mick on November 29, 2008 @ 9:05 am

This is a simple issue: if you decide to live in a building with other people, & the building is governed by a set of rules, you should follow the rules. If you do not want to follow the rules, then don’t live in a building with rules.
If it were not this particular matter – violating your contract by renting your condo on a short-term basis – it would be another matter – say, cooking meth in your condo. It’s a stupid rule, not allowing me to cook meth in my condo, & I can make $5000 cooking meth, so I’m not going to follow it, & I’m going to cook up a batch meth right now. Etc. etc.
As for people paying $5000 not being criminals, that proves your point, eh? Well-to-do people never commit crimes? Go to the Crime & Punishment Museum, as I did yesterday with my family visiting from out-of-town, & study Ted Bundy.
Also, once you rent your condo to someone, what’s going to stop that person from having a pre-parade or post-parade party, & inviting 50 or 100 people, & maybe some of those people won’t be well-to-do like Ted Bundy & might be criminals.
As a member of a community like a condo building, you need to follow the community’s standards. If you refuse to do so, you really should reconsider your decision to live in a condo building.

Comment by LizK on November 29, 2008 @ 12:10 pm

Rules of coops and condos shouldn’t be a la carte. While I personally have no problem with people renting out their units during the inauguration, the standing rules should apply regardless of what I think or what someone else thinks.

Comment by PQ Guy on November 30, 2008 @ 12:05 am

So, renting your condo on a short term basis is now on par with running a meth lab??? Okay, maybe everyone else understands that logic, but I certainly find it laughable.

Next, any argument referencing parties or crime is moot. Who is to say I will not throw a party with 100 people on Inauguration day? Who is to say that I am not a serial killer either? If I recall correctly, there was never a background check on me when I moved in. I don’t recall taking a polygraph either. So, can someone clarify why an owner or yearly renter in a PQ condo is inherently trustworth and someone who wants to rent for a week is an incredible risk?

On that note, I am off to get my next batch of meth going and plan my evening killing spree.

Comment by Freddie Mick on November 30, 2008 @ 11:04 am

For the logic impaired, breaking condo rules is the issue. If each of us decides which rules to follow [a la carte, as someone wisely observed], one person will never recycle, another will feed the pigeons [& rats], another will block the outside door open to make moving easier, another will put some incredibly dangerous mobile “fireplace” in his condo [remember that little discussion last year?], another will open a heroin shooting gallery, another a house of ill repute, etc. etc.
If the condo boards do not enforce the prohibition against short term rentals, the insurance policies will be void. If you want to have your condo burn down & get no insurance payment & still have to pay your $400,000 mortgage, go for it.
Most of the people who want the short term rentals OKed appear to be renters. Renters have less interest in the value of the property, which is logical, but people who have invested hundreds of thousands of dollars have the right to ensure that the rules enacted to protect their investment are followed.
If you want to live in a transient hotel, there are rooms available. If you want to live in a society with no rules, good luck.

Comment by Steve701Penn on November 30, 2008 @ 11:34 am

Can we just disable the ability to post comments in this thread already? Everyone’s spoken their mind, and everyone is firm on their stance. It’s getting to be almost as bad as a debate about religion.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Search

Archives

  • June 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • Recent Comments

      • Take A 10-question Survey To Tell The Downtown DC BID About Your Vision For Gallery Place-Chinatown
        Terrie Chan said: Chinatown...(more)
      • Penn Quarter CVS In Lansburgh Building Closing This Month (435 8th St NW)
        Natalie said: Oh, CVS, you will be missed by us. Last...(more)
      • Penn Quarter Paul Now Fully Closed (801 Penn Ave NW)
        Jo-Ann neuhaus said: Thank you for being out and reporting on opened and...(more)
      • Residents Meet With DC Council At Roundtable Regarding On-Street Musician Noise
        Joan Eisenstodt said: Woohoo. Sorry I was away...(more)
      • Uniqlo Opening On F St In Two Days (1090 F St NW)
        GalleryPlaceGal said: They are open for 6 months; looking for a larger store...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Restaurant Now Open (750 E St NW)
        TC said: After seeing this posting (thx!) we tried HQ the next day. Have to say...(more)
      • Weschler’s Auctioneers & Appraisers Moving To The Suburbs
        Xena said: This is my old office…we just moved a few...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        pqresident said: Thanks @Christina and @Jen for the updates!(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        Jen said: Yep. They are training the staff all next week...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        Christina said: I was told by the crew that was trying to...(more)


Copyright 2006-2023. Penn Quarter Living. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Local Links
  • Condos In PQ
  • Writers
  • Advertising
  • Commenting
  • Contact Us