Penn Quarter Living

Downtown Washington DC/Penn Quarter news and urban commentary

  • About
  • Local Links
  • Condos In PQ
  • Writers
  • Advertising
  • Commenting
  • Contact Us
  • RSS Feed
  • Comments

To Challenge Your Property Tax Assessment Or Not?

Posted by gpliving
March 3, 2009

By now, most PQ condo owners should have received their 2010 Real Property Tax Assessment Change Notice from the DC Office of Tax and Revenue in the mail.  According to OTR’s website, Penn Quarter (assumed to be part of the “Central” neighborhood in this PDF), fared well in the past year and averaged a 1.73% increase in property value (only 7 neighborhoods out of 62 had an increase).  Thus, we can expect our assessments to increase for 2010 by a similar percentage.

However, this blogger is starting to hear grumblings from PQ residents about what DC thinks your condo is worth versus what it could fetch on the open market (i.e. DC’s number is too high).   Fortunately, DC OTR provides an appeal process for those who think that the assessment is unreasonable.

Without getting specific about condo buildings or dollar amounts, are you planning on challenging your 2010 tax assessment?  If you have done so in the past, care to share you experience?  All appeals must be filed by April 1.

Related posts:

  1. Own in PQ? Get The Homestead Deduction!
  2. 1 BRs – Underwater Or On Dry Ground?
  3. Commercial Property Fun
Share

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments
Comment by pqresident on March 3, 2009 @ 5:01 am

what a timely story. my 2010 assessment was bumped up approx. 4% to a number higher than the asking price for comparable units currently on sale. the 10% circuit breaker still keeps me OK but will I appeal? probably.

if the city government wants the revenue upside when property prices rise then they have to be willing to want the revenue downside when property prices fall.

Comment by Columbo on March 3, 2009 @ 7:14 am

We appealed 2009 and won, sort of. While we have a signed stipulation giving us a lower assessment for both 2009 and 2010 (signed in October of 2008) the government has yet to apply that stipulation. So both 2009 and 2010 still show the higher amount, not the lower stipulated value. We’ve talked to the assessor (an extremely nice guy) who promises to get it fixed on the DC Gov end, but still recommended we appeal 2010 just to be safe.

Our 2009 appeal was initially denied, and we had to file a second level appeal. For that one we went with the appeal where you just submit your appeal in writing (we were not present) and the appeals board comes to a decision. If the stipulated value is eventually applied to our assessment it will have been worth it, as it’s a decent savings on our end.

Comment by Jeff@400 Mass on March 3, 2009 @ 7:23 am

I tried to appeal last year when they appraised my condo $75,000 more then recent sales. Despite my following the procedure and repeated follow up calls they never responded.

I came to the conclusion that I was going to have to invest significant time of from work and that it wasn’t worth it.

Comment by MTCinDC on March 3, 2009 @ 8:07 am

I’m definitely appealing…my total value assessment is 11.2% higher than 2009. I’m assuming something is terribly wrong with their system or someone secretly installed a new floor on my condo…

Comment by Columbo on March 3, 2009 @ 8:22 am

An additional note from our successful appeal: They agreed to a lower amount, but not based on the falling real estate prices (the basis of our appeal). In fact they specifically noted that although much of the US was experiencing a decline in real estate, they could find no evidence that our area was suffering from this problem.

They did agree to a lower assessment, but it was based on mistakes by the original assessment of our unit and not market conditions. Of course our appeal was almost a year ago, maybe you’d have better luck with the market conditions argument today.

Comment by Loofa133 on March 3, 2009 @ 8:40 am

Increase in property value? Ha. I understand that DC needs the revenue and we are certainly the people who can most bear it, but realistically, with so many units on the market and with them selling at low prices, often much below assessed value, it is hard to imagine that property has gone up in value by any metric.

Ultimately, if enough people appeal, they will just raise the tax rate, not the values, so in some fashion you will pay a bit more.

Comment by Anonymous on March 3, 2009 @ 9:16 am

The assessment on my unit actually lagged the market on the upswing, so the small (2%) increase this year isn’t unreasonable. The assessment may be high by a few thousand dollars, but the time and effort for an appeal is definitely not worth it when each $1,000 decrease in value only saves $8.50 in property taxes.

Comment by clo*bee on March 3, 2009 @ 11:34 am

My tax assessment is $25K higher than an appraisal that I had completed ~ 2 months ago.

Comment by LiveAndWorkinPQ on March 3, 2009 @ 12:57 pm

I was expecting the worst but actually thought mine was about right – the 2009/2010 was down about 10% from the 2008/2009 assessment. but it’s a newish building so their was no built up appreciation, the assessment was based on the original purchase price a couple of years ago.

Comment by Clara Barton Dweller on March 3, 2009 @ 1:17 pm

I am definitely appealing. One ridiculous part of OTR’s little pipe dream is that my assessment has not gone up the past 2 times, and now it has, by about $40K.

Maybe OTR realized this year that they need more money to cover the millions Harriette Walters spent at Neiman Marcus. But that shouldn’t be OUR problem.

Comment by Kimberly on March 3, 2009 @ 3:04 pm

We closed on our condo in October and I haven’t seen a tax assessment. Should we have received by now, and if not, how can we request it? And if we’d like to appeal, what is the process?
Thanks…

Comment by Anonymous on March 3, 2009 @ 3:37 pm

If you know your square and lot number, you can check the 2010 assessment here:

http://www.taxpayerservicecenter.com/RP_Search.jsp?search_type=Assessment

You can find instructions on how to appeal here:

http://otr.cfo.dc.gov/otr/cwp/view,a,1330,q,594366,otrNav_gid,1679,otrNav,|33280|.asp

Comment by Anonymous on March 3, 2009 @ 4:05 pm

Can anyone who successfully appealed provide practical advice on what type of evidence to include in the appeal. Unfortunately, I don’t think there’s a PACER equivalent for tax assessment dockets to pull examples from.

Comment by Kimberly on March 3, 2009 @ 4:37 pm

Thanks Anon 3:37. This is helpful, although a bit frustrating since we closed on our condo over 5 months ago and it’s still in the developer’s name. In addition, our assessment more than doubled! I assume this is because the last time it was assessed the building was under construction (part of City Vista) but still a bit unnerving. Also it currently says there is no Homestead Exemption applied, but if this is our primary residence we should be eligible, right?
And am I understanding properly that the maximum amount your taxes can increase is 10% per year? (http://otr.cfo.dc.gov/otr/cwp/view,a,1330,q,594289.asp)

Comment by Columbo on March 3, 2009 @ 6:20 pm

Kimberly: refile your homestead exemption, see this earlier post on the subject.

Also, the cap on your tax increase applies only to the tax bill. Your assessed value can go up much more, but your actual bill amount can only go up by a certain percentage.

Comment by pqresident on March 4, 2009 @ 1:40 pm

we had one comment submitted asking about tax abatements on two specific buildings downtown. some condos downtown do have tax abatements in place for multi-year periods that reduces but does not eliminate taxes during the eligibility period. we recommend contacting your condo board, condo management, a trusted realtor who really knows downtown or DC’s OTR to discover that information, its applicability and how it all works. the aforementioned program is not the same as DC’s Lower Income Home Ownership Tax Abatement program.

if you want a feel for how a tax abatement program works, check out this fiscal impact statement on DC’s proposed 2009 NoMa residential tax abatement from Natwar Gandhi, DC’s CFO [PDF file].

questions about our comment policy can be directed to our mailbag at: pqliving [at] gmail [dot] com.

Comment by Si Kailian on March 5, 2009 @ 10:40 am

You can also use your neighbors as a basis for appeal. when you look up your record on the OTR site, you can find all of the records for your neighbors by only entering the square number. sq footage should be listed. you can also look up recent sales the same way.

and certainly a recent appraisal is excellent hard evidence.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Search

Archives

  • June 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • Recent Comments

      • Take A 10-question Survey To Tell The Downtown DC BID About Your Vision For Gallery Place-Chinatown
        Terrie Chan said: Chinatown...(more)
      • Penn Quarter CVS In Lansburgh Building Closing This Month (435 8th St NW)
        Natalie said: Oh, CVS, you will be missed by us. Last...(more)
      • Penn Quarter Paul Now Fully Closed (801 Penn Ave NW)
        Jo-Ann neuhaus said: Thank you for being out and reporting on opened and...(more)
      • Residents Meet With DC Council At Roundtable Regarding On-Street Musician Noise
        Joan Eisenstodt said: Woohoo. Sorry I was away...(more)
      • Uniqlo Opening On F St In Two Days (1090 F St NW)
        GalleryPlaceGal said: They are open for 6 months; looking for a larger store...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Restaurant Now Open (750 E St NW)
        TC said: After seeing this posting (thx!) we tried HQ the next day. Have to say...(more)
      • Weschler’s Auctioneers & Appraisers Moving To The Suburbs
        Xena said: This is my old office…we just moved a few...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        pqresident said: Thanks @Christina and @Jen for the updates!(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        Jen said: Yep. They are training the staff all next week...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        Christina said: I was told by the crew that was trying to...(more)


Copyright 2006-2023. Penn Quarter Living. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Local Links
  • Condos In PQ
  • Writers
  • Advertising
  • Commenting
  • Contact Us