Penn Quarter Living

Downtown Washington DC/Penn Quarter news and urban commentary

  • About
  • Local Links
  • Condos In PQ
  • Writers
  • Advertising
  • Commenting
  • Contact Us
  • RSS Feed
  • Comments

7th Street Promenade? Just A Thought..

Posted by gpliving
May 29, 2007

Recently, we’ve read about residents in Dupont Circle promoting a campaign to create a pedestrian promenade on a five block stretch of 17th St NW. They even put together a website: www.17thstreet.org.

It started to make us wonder if 7th St NW, between D St and H St could one day find itself a pedestrian promenade?

7th street is hardly useful for commuters. The two lane road is usually laden with traffic and commuters use other streets (6th or 9th St) to move more quickly. Also, 7th street does not have any parking garage entrances facing the street. With all of the retail space along 7th, plus the Reynolds Center (Smithsonian), there is little trouble envisioning a pedestrian only stretch of 7th street.

Related posts:

  1. Four More Street Parking Spaces Soon To Dissapear From Gallery Place/Penn Quarter
  2. E Street, NW Road Work Scheduled
  3. Wirefly National Marathon On Saturday
Share

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments
Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 8:29 am

Except that 7th Street is a major thoroughfare for mass transit (buses) — and the only cross-Mall street for a few blocks. Diverting this traffic to other streets would cause bus delays, a disruption of traffic and would cut SW off from NW even more than it is now.

Comment by gpliving on May 29, 2007 @ 8:37 am

Anon: Very good points!

Comment by Mr T in DC on May 29, 2007 @ 8:38 am

I don’t know, in the old days F Street was pedestrianized in front of the Reynolds Center and MLK Library, and it was a dismal failure. It was known unofficially as “Pee Park” from the smell of urine since it became a big hangout for drunks and panhandlers. Maybe widening the sidewalks at the expense of a lane or parking spaces, but leave one through lane in each direction?

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 8:40 am

I would worry about an increase in crime. There are already too many loiterers up to no good on that stretch.

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 8:57 am

Hopefully, the site of the old convention center will fill that role.

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 9:21 am

I think it would be a good idea for H street between 7 and 6th. It is a very dangerous street and I have seen about 5 car accidents and 2-3 people hit there. And it would divert the xpress bus to annother street, which would improve the commercial area a lot. With the street closed, they could permit street vending of Chinatown knicknacks and make it more of a tourist attraction.

Comment by caphillrez on May 29, 2007 @ 9:24 am

I have to agree with the first poster. This is a bad idea. Like it or not 7th street is a major vehicle artery. If 7th street is closed to cars there would be no direct access point to get northbound across Pennsylvania ave. from the mall area between 11th and 3rd streets. I’m not sure where you would divert all that traffic.

While I suppose the southbound traffic could be pushed down 9th street, not sure where you put the northbound traffic. seems like 6th st. would end up as the default for northbound traffic as cars would just make the turn off Pennsylvania onto 6th, which hardly seems ideal and would just lead to the same problems that 7th street has now with cars.

If you really wanted a promendade then g st between 9th and 7th seems more suited. However as someone else already pointed out, I remember when g between 10th and 9th was closed to traffic and it wasn’t a pleasant area to walk through.

If anything I would support widening the sidewalks a bit and getting rid of the parking lanes along 7th.

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 9:59 am

DC could benefit from several pedestrian only zones. These zones are used alot in large European cities, as well as US cities and are very successful. Many people thought they wouldn’t work, but they do.

The congestion on 7th is ridiculous and cars consistently drive through red lights and into pedestrians crossing the street.

Another area that would benefit greatly is Jefferson and Madison along the Mall in front of the museums.

I have also seen cities use bus and taxi only lanes, which clearly expedites this mode of transportation.

Discouraging more cars in the city will make our air a little easier to breathe. I have no problem with this.

It is unfair to compare the use of pedestrian streets from a few years ago, as the area has changed a great deal.

The city also needs to enforce a no pandling/loitering law, which will eliminate alot of the aforementioned problems.

Comment by Tom Veil on May 29, 2007 @ 10:19 am

Both 7 and H are major arteries, and I can’t see the city shutting them down without some DRASTIC construction to make other roads viable arteries.

However, there are a couple good candidates for pedestrian promenades:

1. G St from 9th to 6th (through the mall). It’s already a promenade for a half-block (full block if you count the mall and the alley), and the 9-to-7 stretch does nothing but create three awkward and rarely-used intersections.

2. 8th St from G to K. It’s already a promenade from K to I, and again, the I to G street stretch is useless except for loading docks.

In both cases, the drawback is that these streets could be even more dead than they are now without cars on them. I think the solution in both cases would be to allow street vendors or sidewalk cafes.

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 10:20 am

The area may have improved but 7th Street is still littered with homeless and other panhandlers. If the street were closed, more of these individuals would undoubtedly converge on the area. Furthermore, what’s the point of a pedestrian promenade when the street is full of empty storefronts filled wity Douglas Development signs hanging in the windows. Sounds to me like a bad idea all around.

Comment by Mr T in DC on May 29, 2007 @ 10:26 am

In addition to the panhandlers, pedestrianized streets are notorious for becoming defacto urban skateboard parks. I think that as it stands right now, the streets in vicinity of the Gallery Place metro station have a good mix of pedestrians, cars, buses and bicycles and tinkering with the balance would be ill-advised.

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 10:47 am

What’s the deal with the panhandlers? Does the city not have any recourse to deal with them? They are definitely putting a negative vibe in what should continue to be a major tourist/residential area…

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 11:55 am

I believe 7th Street is also a federal highway and would never be permitted to be closed to traffic. Be happy with what you have people. This is always going to be downtown DC and the first neighborhood off the Mall and an emergency evacuation route.

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 12:14 pm

I agree with others that this seems like a well-intentioned but ill-advised idea. Unfortunately 7th is just way too busy and important to be closed like this, not to mention the possibility of it becoming a crime magnet.

I don’t think the original idea was a complaint, though, so I don’t understand “Be happy with what you have people.” Or is any speculation about ways to improve the neighborhood now seen by some as a complaint by overprivileged crybabies who prefer to live in an area with amenities like a grocery store, open sidewalks, a pedestrian-friendly environment, etc.? I am happy with what I have, but that doesn’t mean I think it couldn’t be any better. Jeesh. (Sorry for venting)

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 1:24 pm

Gee, Anon at 14:00PM, sensiTIVE, aren’t we? This has been a really good and well-behaved dialog. Who hurt your feeleings?

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 1:59 pm

Here is an interesting article on the benefits of pedestrians zones used in cities in the United States.

According to the article, it promotes business and shopping, along with a constant occupancy rate.

http://www.walkinginfo.org/pedsafe/casestudy.cfm?CS_NUM=44

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 4:57 pm

Does anyone know how to get the city/MPD to enforce the bus/bike only lanes on 7th and 9th Streets? I regularly ride my bike in the 7th Street bus/bike lane and get honked at by cars illegally in that lane. Thoughts?

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 5:09 pm

To anonymous 02:59:
There are just as many studies and statistics to show the opposite: pedestrian plazas are often neglected because of the lack of street traffic. I travel on a regular basis and have seen such areas in more than 3 dozen cities across the US (forget Europe, as they have a fundamentally different attitude towards cars and walking) Many turn into tourist traps — places no one would shop in unless they need overpriced tchotchkes. Others are horribly deserted at night when the stores close and become havens for petty crimes. Still others die altogether because of the lack of exposure from passing cars and transit. The idea is romantic and has its place. But it needs to be designed from the ground-up. The plan for the old convention site has a pedestrian plaza with shops and restaurants and entrances to residences — all which should help to deter crime during most hours.

Comment by gpliving on May 29, 2007 @ 5:10 pm

Anon: That question was briefly discussed on the MPD listserv a few months ago. The consensus was that the lane is a 24 hour bus & bike lane, but no info was given regarding its enforcement. My guess is that it would take up too many resources to enforce.

It would seriously take a massive campaign to get every driver to recognize that the lane is 24 hours.

Comment by Anonymous on May 29, 2007 @ 5:33 pm

They should ditch the current traffic pattern on 7th Street and instead use something like what they put on E Street. Traffic would flow much better if there were turning lanes instead of that completely ignored bus/bike lane. Hopefully there would also be room for smaller bike lanes, but that’s a lower priority (they seem to be used rarely on E Street).

Comment by James on May 30, 2007 @ 7:13 am

I’m a big proponent of “shared” streets, where the pedestrian and vehicle zones are blurred. Traffic signals and curbs are done away with and the street is much more pedestrian friendly without sacrificing the vehicle right of way.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_space

Comment by Anonymous on May 30, 2007 @ 8:33 am

In DC, pedestrians have the right of way, not vehicles.

Comment by Anonymous on June 5, 2007 @ 10:39 am

Am I the only one that thinks the bus lane causes more problems than it solves? When I try to abide by it by staying to the left, no one else does and I can’t ever get into the bus/turn lane in time to turn right, and therefore I end up blocking the left lane unnecessarily while waiting for the 30 cars NOT turning from the right lane to pass me. And the shift in lane patterns after crossing the mall seems to confuse everyone.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Search

Archives

  • June 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • Recent Comments

      • Take A 10-question Survey To Tell The Downtown DC BID About Your Vision For Gallery Place-Chinatown
        Terrie Chan said: Chinatown...(more)
      • Penn Quarter CVS In Lansburgh Building Closing This Month (435 8th St NW)
        Natalie said: Oh, CVS, you will be missed by us. Last...(more)
      • Penn Quarter Paul Now Fully Closed (801 Penn Ave NW)
        Jo-Ann neuhaus said: Thank you for being out and reporting on opened and...(more)
      • Residents Meet With DC Council At Roundtable Regarding On-Street Musician Noise
        Joan Eisenstodt said: Woohoo. Sorry I was away...(more)
      • Uniqlo Opening On F St In Two Days (1090 F St NW)
        GalleryPlaceGal said: They are open for 6 months; looking for a larger store...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Restaurant Now Open (750 E St NW)
        TC said: After seeing this posting (thx!) we tried HQ the next day. Have to say...(more)
      • Weschler’s Auctioneers & Appraisers Moving To The Suburbs
        Xena said: This is my old office…we just moved a few...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        pqresident said: Thanks @Christina and @Jen for the updates!(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        Jen said: Yep. They are training the staff all next week...(more)
      • Hen Quarter Plans To Open In Old Austin Grill Space (750 E St NW)
        Christina said: I was told by the crew that was trying to...(more)


Copyright 2006-2023. Penn Quarter Living. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Local Links
  • Condos In PQ
  • Writers
  • Advertising
  • Commenting
  • Contact Us